Secondary structure and disorder prediction |   |
  |   |
1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 10 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 20 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 30 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 40 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 50 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 60 |
Sequence |   |
M | I | W | L | T | L | V | F | A | S | L | L | S | V | A | G | Q | L | C | Q | K | Q | A | T | C | F | V | A | I | N | K | R | R | K | H | I | V | L | W | L | G | L | A | L | A | C | L | G | L | A | M | V | L | W | L | L | V | L | Q | N |
Secondary structure |   |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|
|
|
|
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
SS confidence |   |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disorder |   |
? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ? |
| ? | ? | ? | ? |
|
|
|
|
|
| ? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disorder confidence |   |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
  |
  |   |
. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 70 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 80 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 90 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 100 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 110 | . |
Sequence |   |
V | P | V | G | I | A | Y | P | M | L | S | L | N | F | V | W | V | T | L | A | A | V | K | L | W | H | E | P | V | S | P | R | H | W | C | G | V | A | F | I | I | G | G | I | V | I | L | G | S | T | V |
Secondary structure |   |
|
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|
|
|
|
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|
SS confidence |   |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disorder |   |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ? | ? | ? |
Disorder confidence |   |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
  |
Confidence Key |
High(9) |   |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
  |
Low (0) |
? | Disordered |
  | Alpha helix |
  | Beta strand |
Hover over an aligned region to see model and summary info
Please note, only up to the top 20 hits are modelled to reduce computer load
|
1 |
|
PDB 1s7b chain A
Region: 4 - 110 Aligned: 98 Modelled: 107 Confidence: 99.5% Identity: 24% Fold: Multidrug resistance efflux transporter EmrE Superfamily: Multidrug resistance efflux transporter EmrE Family: Multidrug resistance efflux transporter EmrE
Phyre2
2 |
|
PDB 2i68 chain B
Region: 3 - 108 Aligned: 75 Modelled: 81 Confidence: 97.7% Identity: 25% PDB header:transport protein Chain: B: PDB Molecule:protein emre;
PDBTitle: cryo-em based theoretical model structure of transmembrane2 domain of the multidrug-resistance antiporter from e. coli3 emre
Phyre2
|
Detailed template information |   |
Binding site prediction |   |
Due to computational demand, binding site predictions are not run for batch jobs
If you want to predict binding sites, please manually submit your model of choice to 3DLigandSite
Phyre is for academic use only
Please cite: Protein structure prediction on
the web: a case study using the Phyre server |
Kelley LA and Sternberg MJE. Nature Protocols
4, 363 - 371 (2009) [pdf] [Import into BibTeX] |
  |
If you use the binding site
predictions from 3DLigandSite, please also cite: |
3DLigandSite: predicting ligand-binding sites using similar structures. |
Wass MN, Kelley LA and Sternberg
MJ Nucleic Acids Research 38, W469-73 (2010) [PubMed] |
  |
|
|
|