Introduction

FTDock

RPScore

MultiDock

Systems

Results

Download

References

Contact

BMM Home

icrf logo

Results

Graphs

Below is a table showing the results attained by using the whole of the 3D-dock suite; i.e. running FTDock, followed by RPScore, a biological filter (where available), and finally MultiDock, for each syatem. MultiDock was only run for systems where there was a post-filter rank < 600, on the top 600 putative dockings.
The results here use a cross-validated matrix for each system, so results from using the non-cross validated matrix provided will not be the same (they improve in most cases).
The results shown here are from 2000, and hence do not include results for some systems which appear in the list of systems.


Ranks for first correct docking where structure is less than 3 Angstroms RMSD over all C-alpha atoms from crystal

TestSurface ComplementarityPair Potential+ Filtering+ MultiDock
SystemRankRMSRankRMSRankRMSRankRMSRMS of rank 1
1BRC 206 1.1 1 2.8 1 2.8 3 1.4 7.6
1CGI 89 2.7 2 2.8 1 2.8 92 2.7 6.9
2KAI 31 2.5 106 1.4 21 1.3 15 1.3 6.9
2SIC 1489 2.8 82 1.6 6 2.7 1 1.1 1.1
1BVK 368 1.6 272 2.2 250 2.2 208 3.0 10.6
1MLC 2375 2.6 182 1.8 125 1.8 326 3.0 14.1
1AHW 240 2.4 135 2.4 123 2.4 1 2.4 2.4
1WEJ 200 2.4 27 2.2 27 2.2 36 2.0 10.3
1BGS 542 2.9 3 2.1 3 2.1 72 1.5 10.7
1BDJ 4901 2.6 2661 2.4 2661 2.4 - - 13.7
1DFJ 3 3.0 2956 2.6 941 2.6 - - 16.7
1UGH 118 2.8 474 2.5 60 1.8 7 1.8 3.2
1WQ1 769 2.7 1941 2.8 1941 2.8 - - 13.8
2PCC 1328 2.3 592 2.1 592 2.1 - - 23.2
BLIP 185 1.9 106 2.2 7 2.5 1 1.8 1.8


Ranks for first correct docking where structure is less than 5 Angstroms RMSD over all C-alpha atoms from crystal
TestSurface ComplementarityPair Potential+ Filtering+ MultiDock
SystemRankRMSRankRMSRankRMSRankRMSRMS of rank 1
1BRC 22 3.8 1 2.8 1 2.8 3 1.4 7.6
1CGI 76 3.7 1 3.6 1 3.6 5 4.5 6.9
2KAI 9 3.2 1 3.5 1 3.5 4 3.6 6.9
2SIC 318 4.2 82 1.6 6 2.7 1 1.1 1.1
1BVK 97 4.9 25 4.4 25 4.4 6 4.4 10.6
1MLC 2373 4.7 34 4.6 24 4.6 203 4.8 14.1
1AHW 23 4.1 135 2.4 123 2.4 1 2.4 2.4
1WEJ 33 4.1 27 2.2 27 2.2 27 4.4 10.3
1BGS 104 4.4 2 4.3 2 4.3 13 4.1 10.7
1BDJ 661 4.1 687 3.9 687 3.9 - - 13.7
1DFJ 3 3.0 22 4.5 10 4.5 6 4.9 16.7
1UGH 61 3.5 40 4.8 13 4.8 1 3.2 3.2
1WQ1 248 4.8 198 4.0 198 4.0 3 4.1 13.8
2PCC 26 4.5 59 4.9 59 4.9 227 5.0 23.2
BLIP 185 1.9 106 2.2 6 4.5 1 1.8 1.8


At each of the RMSDs along the X-axis (calculated by a C-alpha fit against the X-ray complex), we recorded the number of test systems for which a complex of that RMSD or better was generated. Then this number can be simply divided by the number of complexes (15) to give a 'probability of success' at that RMSD. The different lines show the result if it is additionally demanded that the complex be ranked first by the program, or if it need only be in the top 3, top 5, etc. performance after filtering as function of resolution